The Framework

The FLAIMS Framework

A new operating system for the organisation of tomorrow. Six pillars on one foundation: functions that belong apart are kept apart. And AI is part of the structure from the start.

Foundation

The foundation: functional decoupling

Most companies mix things in the same role that get in each other's way: the manager coaches you and decides on your pay. The project lead is accountable for the outcome and writes the rules themselves. The CEO designs the system and reviews it as well. That creates role conflict, and role conflict has been one of the best documented drivers of stress and poor performance since Kahn 1964. FLAIMS pulls these functions apart: designing, owning, supporting and reviewing sit in separate jobs. That is the foundation, and it is the reason why high performance and high wellbeing come from the same structure in FLAIMS.

Anatomy of FLAIMS

Six letters, six questions.

What each letter does, in short. Click a pillar for mechanics, evidence and practice.

How it fits together

Six pillars, one job architecture.

The pillars say what a company has to get right. The job architecture says who holds it. The same system, described twice: once as principle, once as structure.

  • One Steward per pillar. The Steward sets the frame and has no management power.
  • Below the Steward, Anchor Core Jobs that structure the field and implement it themselves.
  • Below that, Core Jobs, each with full outcome accountability, and Joblets that support them.
  • Every Core Job owes its accountability directly to governance, no matter how deep it sits.
See the blueprints
Adoption

Three stages of adoption

1

Stage 1, Foundation

Separate the functions, give every outcome a name, make the most important numbers visible to everyone.

2

Stage 2, Rhythm

Design flow, deploy FlowCoaches, put governance on numbers instead of gut feeling.

3

Stage 3, the whole model

Six Stewards, Anchor Core Jobs, Core Jobs, Joblets. All six letters as one system.

The Evidence

Practice first, then the evidence.

Every pillar emerged from insights from the field, paired with the research that explains those insights. The Evidence section shows which source supports which part of the model and what it does not prove. Every building block is proven; the model as a whole is new, but it consists of existing best practices and is informed by research.

See the cognitive biases FLAIMS protects against →
  • 01
    Self-Determination Theory
    Deci & Ryan, 1985

    Autonomy, competence and relatedness as the three needs that drive sustainable motivation.

  • 02
    Flow State Theory
    Csikszentmihalyi, 1990

    The cognitive state where skill, attention and challenge align, and people work at their best.

  • 03
    Psychological Safety
    Edmondson, 1999

    Teams learn faster when people can speak up about mistakes and unfinished ideas without losing status.

  • 04
    Deliberate Practice
    Ericsson, 1993

    Expertise comes from focused practice with fast feedback at the edge of current ability.

  • 05
    Conway's Law
    Conway, 1968

    The systems an organisation builds mirror its communication structure.

  • 06
    Dunbar's Number
    Dunbar, 1992

    Natural group-size thresholds (≈5, 15, 50, 150) at which trust and coordination shift.

  • 07
    Level 5 Leadership
    Collins, 2001

    Durable great companies are led with personal humility and professional will.

  • 08
    Human-Centered AI
    Shneiderman, 2022

    High machine automation and high human control are not a contradiction.

  • 09
    Systems Thinking
    Senge, 1990

    Recurring problems usually have structural causes, not personal ones.

Blueprints, best practices, insights

New blueprints on LinkedIn.

Get new blueprints, best practices and research-grounded insights on the FLAIMS framework. Subscribe to the LinkedIn newsletter.

Subscribe on LinkedIn
Monthly, directly on LinkedIn. No spam.